SINCE his days as a presidential candidate, he has repeatedly called Iran’s nuclear deal the worst agreement the United States has ever made in its history and if he becomes president, it will not be allowed to continue. This was Donald Trump’s statement as a candidate, and after he became the president, he repeated it. He explained the reasons for his dissatisfaction with the agreement. He termed the deal as unfair as it allowed Iran to earmark huge sums of money, which runs into millions of US dollars, to support and spread terrorism in the region — directly or through terrorist factions and militias such as Hezbollah, the Houthis and others — and thus continuing to be a supportive force for terrorism.
Maintaining his open, frank and unambiguous position, Donald Trump scrapped the Iranian nuclear deal and announced the US exit from it. In doing so, Trump resisted a lot of pressure exerted by some of his allies in the West, especially France, Britain and Germany, who have committed themselves to mega trade deals with the Iranian regime and fear the deterioration of Iran’s economic conditions as a result of looming sanctions on the regime will take a heavy toll on the proceeds from their mega trade deals.
Donald Trump was also under pressure from former US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson as well as former National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster, who had repeatedly expressed their disapproval over any kind of change in the agreement, let alone its abolition. The intransigent position taken by them on the deal, in fact, led to their eventual dismissal and they were replaced by two other key figures who have similar views to that of President Trump.